I raplIed, in my Letter of 18 Augwt l$?fj8, that f w~i8 sure that my esrtimate
orprpe*ton8 oftastingpm?y#xwa8 not f?&ntastiaalfye~ed,
although I had to base xy estlmata on bits of published in&m&ion, and
thatgcsrhaypr 201~@xmwmolosertothetruth.

Yawadxborwrote asthausplhewere ar~rurthorityonthec sub$sct, ka#vlng
the fwts.  id&d-t farwpthe fkmte.
m%aledyuuandxm.           Xf yuw advisor wm an ruathcMty, he
         fir he was not en authority, he ~~eeznm to have posed aa

I am rritiq this letter to ym jut fm ymr inform&ion,  I J&&e that ycru
find it vE?ry dlmault to &et good refwees for the ~lCle8 sub8altted to
tlCXHEB, mdthialetteris deslgmdtopointoutthst there is one a&lam
that you might well not um in the atture.

Sincere;lSryaure,

Matated by proies8or Pmling
Sian&l 3.n his &mmczer.lh