a degenerate helkx, ,such as a straight line or a circle. Notice that a hel.ix accounts rather naturally for the long repeat distance of the structure, as this would correspond to one turn of the helix. Thlis restriction - that the phosphate-sugar groups are spatially uniform - is a great help in model building as it reduces very considerably the number of possibilities that have to be explored. Indeed at first we were unable to build any satisfactory model consistent with our assumptbons, but eventually we arrived at a structure which we now bel&ve to be correct in its broad outlines, This particular,model does not contain just one DNA " chain, but a pair of'them, wound round a common axis, These two chains are Hnked together by their bases, A base on one chain is joined by weak ph,vsical bonds to a base at the same level on the &&her chain, and all the. bases'are, paired of bn this way rrtight along the structure. This is'shown diagrammatically in Fig. . The general appearance of the structure is shown Pn a symbolic mariner.... Fig. , in which the two ribbons represent the phosphate sugar chains, and the pairs of bases holdine them together are symbolfzed as horPeonta7 rods. It wltll be found that t~lls~figure looks exactly the same upside down , and to preserve this feature * we have bui2.t our model so that the actual sequence of atoms in one phosphate-sugar' chain is In the opposite direction to the corresponding sequence in the other, This\rls shown symbolically by the two small arrows. Now it is found that one cannot build this model with any bases one pleases; only aertain pairs of the four bases will fit into the structure, In any pair there must always be one big one (purinej and one little one(pyrimidine). If one tries to put in two purines - two big ones, that is, - there is not sufficient room for them. ConverselPy a pair made of two pyrimidines is too small to bridge the gap between the two chains. Moreover when one examines in detail hQvv the hydroaen bonds are formed between the bases it is found that (making ce,rtain plausible assumptions) the pairing is even more restricted. The only possible pairs that ~111 fit in are and Adenine with Thymine. Guanine with Cytosine. The way these pairs are formed 9s shown in Figa 9 The dotted lines show the weak physical bonds, knom as hydrogen bo;ds,i which hold the two bases of a pair together. (hydroP;en bondsare, for example, the main forces holding 1 different water'molecures together, and it is because of t'nem that wqter 5.s.a IPquid at room temperatures a?d not a gas) / ; ! . lk !Thkse s'pec3.fJ.c pairs can be built into the structure i either wa,y round. ve can have adsnine on the first chain ,,, paired wi&h thymine oh the second, or vita versa, Hut if' ,. we do .bave adenine at some point on one of the chains, it is , essential to have thymine paired with it on the other. It, I iS impossible to fit in guanine or cytosine or a second adenine. In the same way guanine must always be paired with cgtosine. On t*he other hand the model places no restriction on the sequence of pairs of bases as one proceeds along the structure4 ; ; Any JU speciiic pair can follow any other specific pair. .This is because a pair of bases is flat, and as in this mode'1 they are stacked one above another like a pSle of mini it'does not matter which pair goes above whPch, I This spec'lfic pairing of the bases 1s the direct rasult . of the assumption that both phosphate-sugar chains are'helical; 'This !lmplPes that the distance apart of two sugar groups at ', the same level (bne belonging to each chain) is always the . 1 same, no matter 'where one is along the chain. It follows that. the bases, which are of course linked to the sugars, have always the same amount of space in which to fit, as can be seen from studying Fig. . If it were not for thSs restriction the bases c&nd hy,dro?yen-bond together in many' \ different ways. It is the regularity of, the phosphate-sugar ' zhains , ,therefore, which is at * g Evidence for the model The experimental evidence in support of a mod@. the root of the ,speci ftL.c . of general type is now considerable. lXeasurenents of the density, I ,!'.> and water content of the DNA fibres, taken with. the evidence showing how the PibreS can be extended in leng%h, strongly suggest that there are two DNA chains in the structural unit. The X-ray patterns have a larpe number of places where the diffraction intensity i.s zero and these occur exactly where one expects them from helical structures of this type, Moreover the X-ray diffractton data approximates quite closely to cylindrical symmetry, as Pt should. Recently Wilkins and his co--workers have given a brilliant analysis of the detafls of the X-ray pattern of the crystalline form, and have shown that they are consistent with a structure of this type, though in thI.s form the bases are not perpendicular to the fibre axis, but tilted awe.y from it* ,As f the structure is a relatively stiff one it easily explains the extended shape of the DNA in solution. It is also consistent with the tftration curve. ThPs has irreversible features which suggest that the bases are hydro,gn-bonded together. However the most striking support for the specific paifing :7f the bases comes f,rom the recent analytlcal data. These show that for every species so far examined - and there are over fo\rty of them ~nxdsx - the number of adenines in some given DNA is closely equal to the number of thymines, and the nwnl?er of guanines equal. to the number of cytosbnes, althoupl? the cross--ratio (between say adenine and guanine) can vary considerably from species to species. This remakable . fact, which is exactly what one would expect from a model containing only the spacific pairs, was first pointed out by Dr. Chargaff, Indeed, since the sequence of bases along a single chain is believed to be irrema2aaL this result is very df.f"icuIt to explain except b,y spe;cific pairinK. It ml,qh+ be thought that while this model might be correct for the DNA extracted from the cell and made into fibres the DNA in the cell was in a radically different 981~ form. This see!ns unlikely since ft is difficult to see how the very charact- aristic features of the model could be produced merely by the extraction procedure. However Dr, Wlkins has shown that it is possible to get very similar X-ray pictures from intact biological material, such as sparm heads and bacteriophage, so that there seems little doubt that the structure is biologPcally significant. The present pos;ftion is tl-lerefore that while the details of the structure remain to be worked out - and :.MAl this is done the model cannot be considered as proved - it seems very nrobable that the following statements will stand the test of time: 1. The structure consists of two chains 2. The chains are helfcal and wound round a common axis. 3. They are held together by h,ydrogen bonds between specific pairs of bases. 4. The structure occurs in biologically intact material, 13 / A nosslble replication mechanism NOW the exc4Xl.?g thing about a pnodal of thfs type fs that ft Imrx!ediately su.ggests how the DNA mig:blt produce an exact copy 07 itself. This is beg/&se tha model consists of two parts, each oif which is the complement 8 the other. The basic idea is thak the two chains in the structure unwind and separate, ,Each chai.n then acts as a sort of mould onto which a new compl,ementar.y chamn aan be synthesised, When this process is complete there will be two pairs of chains where we only had one betore. Moreover, because of the specific pairl.ng of the bases the sequence of the pairs of bases will %ave been duplicated ',exactly. `// As an analogy cons$der two photographic films, one a t posit&e ard the other h negative of the same scene. Now if one @ves the positive to one person , and asks him to print a negative from i.t, and also .qSvcs the orfqkal negative to another persorl, nqd ask him to print a positive from it they W-illE end up with two pairs o-P photographs, each like the orfghnl pair. We shall, in effect have made an exact Copy of our orIgina pair I.n one step. To see bon: this works out l.9 the case of DNA let us consider t-he process in rather more detail, i3iwe we have to synthesise two new chains w xq reqllirt3 Some new material. The exact precursors of D.?JA are not. known, but 2et us assume for simplicity t'nat it is buf.lt up from nucleotides, which is the Tame given to the small SBolecules which contain one phosphate, one sugar and one base. Imagine,then, that we have a sZn,gle helical chain of DNA, and t?aat floatiqq EnroundA.t, inside the cell, there is d supply of the four sorts of nucleotides. Every now and then a lose nucleotfde wi.12 attach itself by its base to one of the bases of the DNA chain. NOW Pf th%s happens to two '; adjoining bases; and i.f the loose nucleotides are the type which can form specific pairs with those already there, they will be bn just the right positLo to be joir?ed together, and, eventually , to form part of the new chain. If one or both of them is not the correct type to go in at that point it will be impossible to join them together and before long they will diffuse,elsewhere. Thus only the nucleotides with the At the moment this IAaa aust bs rwnrh9d simply a!5 a suspect &hat the replication starts almast as soon as the most alosely m3sociated~.wfth regU.cation ep strCzlctum 0i exactly `t'ne -type one would need to carry out a specific replica-t~an S~taaga process, namel"y one showing both varfety and compleme~tarity, \Ve can 0nI.y hope that the simplicitsy of the i&?a will stimulate SoTi3eone to devise some new experiments which will either prove or disprove it.