Skip to main contentU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. National Library of Medicine


Profiles in Science
   
Pinterest badge Follow Profiles in Science on Pinterest!

The Joshua Lederberg Papers

Title:
Letter from Bernard D. Davis to Joshua Lederberg pdf (177,646 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Letter from Bernard D. Davis to Joshua Lederberg
Description:
Item is handwritten.
Number of Image Pages:
2 (177,646 Bytes)
Date:
1949-07-20 (July 20, 1949)
Creator:
Davis, Bernard D.
Recipient:
Lederberg, Joshua
Rights:
Reproduced with permission of Elizabeth M. Davis.
Relation:
Lederberg Grouping: Correspondence B
Box Number: 6
Folder Number: 200
Unique Identifier:
BBADDK
Accession Number:
5
Document Type:
Letters (correspondence)
Language:
English
Format:
application/pdf
image/tif
Physical Condition:
Good
Series: Correspondence, 1935-2002
SubSeries: 1947-1953
Folder: Davis, Bernard D.
Transcript:
July 20, 1949
Dear Josh,
In our first recombination expt. with your strain, 58-161 and W-677 were grown with a heavy mol[?]. (1 mol. of an overnight culture of each separately and together) in 5 mol. of minimal medium and 0.2% yeast extract (Difeo[?]) and 0.2% casein hydrolysate (Sheffield NS-case) and 50 mL/mol. biotin. After 6 hours of cultivation at 35 degrees C. Without shaking, the cells were worked in the manner described in your paper, and 10-0, 10-1 and 10-2 mol. of the heavily turbid suspensions plated in 10 mol. of our minimal agar (of PNAS) on top of 15 mol. of socal.[ ? ] The results obtained were as follows (vertical columns of successive colony counts at 1,2,3, and 4 days).
[TABLE]
The irregularity that disturbed us in this expt. is the large drop from 10-0 to 10-1 inst. In a second expt. the results were smoother ; in this we used a medium with 0.5 % YE and 50 mL/mol. niotin, but no NZ.
At 48 hrs. incub. of the plates, the plate mixture gave 4 cols. from 10-0 of each of the two strains, 1 col. from 10-1 of each, whereas the tube mixture (4 hrs, growth) gave 141 from 10-0 55 from 3X10-1, 17 from 10-1, and 8 from 10-2. There were all nucloid[?] on further incubation, smaller non-nucloid[?] colonies continued to appear.
In another expt. which used your mutants with the same requirements but without the superposed heterozygosity for virus[ ?] and fermentation. (I don't have the sheet here - I think it was Y-10 instead of one of the above),
[END PAGE ONE]
[BEGIN PAGE TWO]
the prototrophs obtained were not nucloid[?] but the results were otherwise much the same - very few prototrophs from plate mixtures, perhaps 50 X as many from tube mixtures grown a few hours.
I see no obvious reason why this phenomenon should have turned up in our experiments but not in yours. Tho [SIC] there's nothing special about our minimal medium, I suppose you'll have to try it if you want to duplicate out conditions. The other factors seem pretty standard.
If you feel this presents a serious problem, I'd be glad in September to set up any parallel expts. that you believe would help clarify it.
I'm glad Gordon Allen in definitely going to your lab at the beginning of August. I'm sure he'll learn a lot, and I hope you enjoy the visit.
Sincerely,
Bernie
Metadata Last Modified Date:
2017-02-24
Linked Data:
RDF/XML     JSON     JSON-LD     N3/Turtle     N-Triples