Skip to main contentU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. National Library of Medicine

Profiles in Science
Pinterest badge Follow Profiles in Science on Pinterest!

The Joshua Lederberg Papers

Letter from Sofia "Topsy" (Simmonds) Fruton to Joshua Lederberg pdf (112,006 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Letter from Sofia "Topsy" (Simmonds) Fruton to Joshua Lederberg
Item is handwritten.
Number of Image Pages:
2 (112,006 Bytes)
1955-10-03 (October 3, 1955)
Fruton, Sofia "Topsy" (Simmonds)
Yale University. School of Medicine
Lederberg, Joshua
Courtesy of Joshua Lederberg.
The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science program has made every effort to secure proper permissions for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however, it has either not been possible to identify or contact the current copyright owner. If you have information regarding the copyright owner, please contact us at
Lederberg Grouping: Correspondence C
Box Number: 10
Folder Number: 92
Unique Identifier:
Accession Number:
Document Type:
Letters (correspondence)
Physical Condition:
Series: Correspondence, 1935-2002
SubSeries: 1953-1960
Folder: Fruton, Joseph & Sofia ("Topsy")
October 3, 1955
Dear Josh:
I wonder if I can bother you again and ask you to send me new transfers of your 177 (series auxotroph) and 1975 (serine/glycine). Over the summer, something seems to have happened to our cultures. Their absolute requirements for amino acids apparently increased about 2-fold. I've tried everything I can think of to find the reason for this change (checking the Tatum basal medium, the amino acids we use, and reisolating from single cell colonies after planting) with no success.
As a last resort, I feel we should try your stocks directly. If they behave as they first did, I shall immediately have some lyophillized cultures made so I shouldn't have to bother you again.
I thought you might like to hear some of our newer data on these strains, which are turning out to be much more complex than we thought -- and wrote about in the 2 published papers.
One of my students is working on 1975 and found that it apparently adapts to the utilization of [ . . . ] by prolonged culturing in the presence of that amino acid. Actually, this is not really an adaptation because once
the culture is able to grow on [ . . . ], it doesn't lose this ability by repeated serial passage through serine. The new strain grows on [ . . . ], serine, or glycine and, compared with 1975, its requirement for serine or glycine [?] is markedly reduced. We can't explain the reduced serine/glycine requirement as yet. The new [ . . . ] strain is, unfortunately, not very stable and often reverts to wild type.
Several interesting things have come up concerning 1977. This serine auxotroph can be converted to a serine/glycine auxotroph in several ways: (a) by prolonged incubation in Tatum basal and high concentration of glycine; (b) by relatively short incubation in Tatum basal and high concentrations of glycine and glutamic acid; (c) by relatively short incubation in Tatum basal devoid of asparaqine[?] but glycine and glutamic acid. Thus, asparaqine[?] inhibits the "adaptation" and glutamic reverses the inhibition. Why, I don't know.
On the other hand, if 1977 is given Glycylqlycine[?] (or several other glycine peptides) in place of serine, it grows almost as readily as on serine and infinitely better than on free glycine. Cells grown up on Glycylqlycine[?] apparently are not adapted to growth on free glycine. This problem is now the center of our attention, as you can imagine.
Obviously 1977 and 1975 are much more complex organisms than we thought are first, and we are indebted to you for opening up this field for us.
With best regards,
Topsy Fruton.
Metadata Last Modified Date:
Linked Data:
RDF/XML     JSON     JSON-LD     N3/Turtle     N-Triples