The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science
program has made every effort to secure proper permissions
for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however,
it has either not been possible to identify or contact the
current copyright owner.
If you have information regarding the copyright owner,
please contact us at
I have just seen Leonard Lerman who I know you met here with Nowick--he tells me he is going to marry and he is going to marry
into a genetical family--Miss Lindegren!
Teaching in the college has taken up most of my time this year but I have run across something which I think should be followed
up. I was operating on some dikaryons as Harden did years ago to separate the two monokaryons. My dikaryan was A'B'smt
[END PAGE ONE]
[BEGIN PAGE TWO]
s being the morph. mutant streak and m' a uracil [ . . . ] I was looking for cytoplasmic effects or delay in gene expression
and this I did not get--or rather I think I have something of the sort but in a very curious way. One of the successful operations
gave use to monokaryon which was very very dwarf. This, phenotype d', crossed with wild type gave rise to wild type,
streak (s), d' and two new phenotypes d and s'. I [ . . . ] to be a new single gene mutant and d' was the double
mutant sd, so that all that had happened was that the outcome of the operation was a new mutant d in the nucleus of A'B'
smt. But what about streak (s) which should segregate out and what about the s' mycelia? Well s' when [ . . . ]
crossed with wild type segregates s and t perfectly normally, and furthermore s' actually sectors into s more or less
randomly with an average of something less than 1 sector per plate. I don't think this can be regarded as a genic change
of s--s' and back again but I think it must be a non-genic change, the two alternatives being rather stable through several
hundred cell divisions. It is not a virus.