The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science
program has made every effort to secure proper permissions
for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however,
it has either not been possible to identify or contact the
current copyright owner.
If you have information regarding the copyright owner,
please contact us at
I enquired at the housing bureau today. Nothing has been found for you yet, but the woman there is confident that there will
be no difficulty, so don't worry.
Am very busy getting things cleared up so that I can leave by June 14 for Seattle. However, I wanted to tell you of some
fascinating observations by Klein in adaptations in Ps. putiefacies[?]. Wild type P.p. grows well in sucrose and maltose
but not in glucose or fructose. Last year, Klein showed that it gives
rise to spontaneous glucose-[ . . . ] mutants, the biochemical basis of the mutation apparently being the ability of the mutants
to produce an (adaptive)
The picture then became:
The fate of the free fructose [ . . . ] is till unclear (no fructokinase in the cells).
Recently, he stated to study maltose breakdown (also adaptive) and discovered to our joint amazement that maltose-grown wild-type
cells are simultaneously adapted to both maltose and glucose. It could be argued, of course, that growth[?] on maltose had
selected for the glucose mutant, but this eliminated a) by showing that maltose-grown cells, transferred to glucose, showed
the typical 4-5 day lag before growth occurred that signalizes[?] selection
[END PAGE ONE]
[BEGIN PAGE TWO]
of the rare glucose mutants and b) that wild type cells grown in broth and then adapted to maltose in resting cell suspension
could oxidize glucose and maltose at the same rate thereafter. This finding of course wreaks our simple picture of the biochemical
basis for the glucose mutation. We have two hypotheses : a) the Kleinian - - that w.t. cells are impenetrable to free glucose,
so that only glucose formed internally (e.g. in maltose breakdown) can initiate adaptation. On this basis, the mutation would
be nothing[?] only a change in permeability b) the Stanierian - - that for some reason in w.t. cells induction of glucokinase
formation by the substrate in blocked, but induction by maltose can occur. This would make the glucose mutation a change
in the inductive mechanism, rather than a change in permeability.
Any ideas on this? The Kleinian hypothesis in untenable, I think.