Many thanks for the reprints. I enjoyed and appreciated your accolades in the Rutgers speech. In the same mail was a review
by Horowitz and Owen from Physiol Rev on bacteriol genetics. Our "press" there was more not understanding perhaps
By the way Jane had a 7 1/2 pound male -- now named Adam Paul Novick -- on Jan 25 -- which happens to be our wedding anniversary.
He is an angel, getting up only once in the night to be fed.
In connection with the reprints, I wonder if you have any extra reprints of the procedure (along with B.D.D.) for the isolation
of biochemical mutants and if so could I have one. Also do you have or know of some purineless and/or pyrimidineless mutants,
in B preferably. I'll write to Gots.
I wonder if you have made the following estimate of the [ . . . ] locus in K-12. From the linked transduction expts you have
an idea of the length (in recombination units) that of chromosome that can be carried by the traducing phage. This can correspond,
I would think, at most to the amount of DNA in the phage. Knowing or having some guesses from certain loci as to the maximum
density of loci along the chromosome, you of course have everything. But perhaps this upper limit for the
[END PAGE ONE]
[BEGIN PAGE TWO]
size of a locus turns out to be so large as to be uninteresting.
Little news here otherwise. I have been preparing this damn review (more worrying about than writing) and doing a lot of small
things. The kinetics of adaptation are being continued -- although the shapes of the curves make no sense. They just are not
I finally sent the Kaplan MS back. It was very bad. His evidence that the "s" character is a mutation, makes me wonder
I'm currently angry with Bryson. I discover that he used in his "Science" article on his [ . . . ] references
not only to the MGB but to some kind of gov't progress report. I just wrote him asking for reprints. Probably will mean
a FBI clearance.