Capital punishment may not be the most urgent of our social problems, but its perpetuation in this state is almost too revealing
of fundamental aspects of human nature. I hope our legislators will not overlook that responsibility to forward the ideals
of their constituency on which representative government depends.
Before moving to California, I lived many years in the State of Wisconsin which had abolished capital punishment some time
ago. There never was the slightest indication, nor has any objective evidence ever been forwarded, that this restraint has
encouraged capital crimes. Experts have repeatedly pointed out that so long as any homicides evade punishment, and certainly
some do, the certainty of being caught and held to account would be the most effective deterrent, regardless of whether a
small fraction of crime evoke the death penalty.
What would we lose by abolition? We would lose a source of serious division in our community. We would lose the satisfaction
of social revenge which hides behind the justification of deterrency. We would lose the expensive and long drawn out legal
procedures that must surround capital punishment and could otherwise be simplified. We would lose the risk and uncertainty
- which may be the real reason behind the angry aggression felt by many citizens - of the irretrievable punishment of the
innocent, as must sometimes happen, however rarely. We would lose the temptation to extreme violence now given to psychopathic
personalities who may be more excited than deterred by the possibility of a capital judgment of his crimes and the attention
they then receive. We would lose the lurid reporting of murder trials that now disgraces even the better of our newspapers.
We might gain a small step towards the rational treatment of crime as social injury, and towards the reinstatement of charity
as an element in our human relations.