Skip to main contentU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. National Library of Medicine

Profiles in Science
Pinterest badge Follow Profiles in Science on Pinterest!

The Joshua Lederberg Papers

Letter from Joshua Lederberg to G. J. V. Nossal, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research pdf (140,060 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Letter from Joshua Lederberg to G. J. V. Nossal, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Item is handwritten. Item is a photocopy.
Number of Image Pages:
2 (140,060 Bytes)
1958-10-21 (October 21, 1958)
Lederberg, Joshua
Nossal, G. J. V.
Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Original Repository: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Archive
This item is in the public domain. It may be used without permission.
Lederberg Grouping: Correspondence C
Metadata Record Letter from Bronwyn Hewitt to Joshua Lederberg (August 10, 1995) pdf (243,346 Bytes) ocr (5,545 Bytes)
Box Number: 12
Folder Number: 159
Unique Identifier:
Accession Number:
Document Type:
Letters (correspondence)
Physical Condition:
Series: Correspondence, 1935-2002
SubSeries: 1953-1960
Folder: Nossal, G. J. V.
Hi Gus --
I'm just returning from a quick trip to St. Louis where I had my first good chance to talk at some length with Mel Cohn. He has a well designed and well executed system for studying antiphage and I have to say at the outset that he is certainly finding "double yielders". I don't think the discrepancy is due so much to the precision of his test (which is, to be sure) rather laborious but to the character of his antigen and technique of mi[ . . .]ization. There is some circumstantial evidence that double-yielders arise mainly under maximum int[ . . .] stimulation so as, so to speak, to swamp the responding system. Furthermore he s[ . . . ]d strongly first with one antigen and only then with the second. On the whole this might fit more easily with a hypermutability hypothesis than a pre-fixed clones idea, but of course the experiment is not decisive for either one. Even so, the incidence of nonyielders: anti T-1; anti T-5; double yielders was about 250:15:7:3 which I suspect is statistically significantly different from your summary; perhaps not.
Mel said he and Ed Lennox are in correspondence about your ms. He has a number of criticisms, many of which are reasonable to some degree, and some of which I have voiced myself, but none seem to me crucial. I hope you will get this critique and will reply in due course, in the same constructive spirit in which it is written. We are both looking forward to your coming to Stanford, Mel was independently thinking of inviting you to come as his guest, and I am sure we will have a happy and exciting
time -- inter alii, rectifying the source of the indicated discrepancies, which can only lead to a deeper insight. He has similar aspirations in clonal analysis, although our approaches differ enough this should be mutually helpful.
As ever
Metadata Last Modified Date:
Linked Data:
RDF/XML     JSON     JSON-LD     N3/Turtle     N-Triples