Again, thank you -- and especially for caveats aplenty.
One you did not stress -- out of understandable charity for Rabi -- is that moral revulsion is no substitute for analysis
in presenting an argument. E.G. I am sure that the CHC minority report was enfeebled by its lecturing on what constituted
That same certainty about what was right and wrong may have reduced Rabi's incentive to elaborate on the proposal.
Taken as classification into angels and devils, this is of course a subset under polarization.