Roy Avery sent this glowing response to Stanley after having read an early version of Stanley's festschrift of Thomas
Francis, which included a considerable portion on the work of Oswald Avery on the "Transforming Principle." Roy Avery
further complimented Stanley on his comments at the Oswald T. Avery Memorial Gateway dedication five years earlier.
Item is a photocopy.
Number of Image Pages:
1 (93,430 Bytes)
1970-01-26 (January 26, 1970)
Stanley, Wendell M.
Original Repository: University of California, Berkeley. Bancroft Library. Wendell M. Stanley Papers.
Courtesy of the University of California, Berkeley. Bancroft Library.
The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science
program has made every effort to secure proper permissions
for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however,
it has either not been possible to identify or contact the
current copyright owner.
If you have information regarding the copyright owner,
please contact us at
After the Discovery: The Transforming Principle's Reception by the Scientific Community
The arrival of your good letter and manuscript touched off the little red button on the switch-board of my mind marked, high
voltage. It opened the flood-gate of memory and released an uncontrolled tumbling torrent of long pent up reminiscences.
The reading of your manuscript gave me much pleasure, I am in accord with the motivation and the make up of its contents.
Do you feel that the addition of the word great in the title would further whet the curiosity of those who are unaware of
this odd situation? The title would read: "The Undiscovered" Great Discovery. When I find myself doing this sort
of thing I feel naughty as though I were laying a heavy hand on some one else's brain-child. So tell me off if you feel
There are two apologies due you. One for this outrageously delayed reply that may have caused you some embarrassment in your
effort to meet a possible dead line for publication. I had just recovered from a mild virus infection of short duration when
a whopper toppled me. I am now back on the rails with a full head of steam ready to roll again. That's not a bad accomplishment
for a fellow who carries around in his pocket a hunting and fishing license surcharged in red ink with the word "aged".
The other apology has been due you for almost five years. I should have personally congratulated you on your excellent presentation
of brother's work, your tribute to and acknowledgement of the significance of his discovery. I only wish brother could
have been there to have heard you and seen the evolvement of a genetic code. Unabashed I confess I was overcome with acute
emotion. Then Dr. Bronk read an irrelevant portion from one of my two letters to him, in both of which I had pleaded with
him not to call on me to speak. That scuttled me.
What you have said and written has added much to brother's stature and will go a long way toward helping to place his
discovery in a proper scientific perspective.