Skip to main contentU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. National Library of Medicine

Profiles in Science
Pinterest badge Follow Profiles in Science on Pinterest!

The Maxine Singer Papers

Letter from Marianne Grunberg-Manago to Maxine Singer pdf (245,532 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Letter from Marianne Grunberg-Manago to Maxine Singer
Item is handwritten.
Number of Image Pages:
4 (245,532 Bytes)
Date Supplied:
12 October 1958
[Grunberg-Manago, Marianne]
Institut Biologie Physico-Chimique
Singer, Maxine
Original Repository: Library of Congress. Maxine Singer Papers
Courtesy of the Library of Congress.
The National Library of Medicine's Profiles in Science program has made every effort to secure proper permissions for posting items on the web site. In this instance, however, it has either not been possible to identify or contact the current copyright owner. If you have information regarding the copyright owner, please contact us at
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH):
Exhibit Category:
Nucleic Acids, the Genetic Code, and Transposable Genetic Elements: A Life in Research
Metadata Record Letter from Maxine Singer to Marianne Grunberg-Manago (October 14, 1959) pdf (67,954 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Box Number: 42
Folder Number: 7
Unique Identifier:
Document Type:
Letters (correspondence)
Physical Condition:
Series: Subject Files, 1950-2002, n.d.
SubSeries: Biochemists
Folder: Grunberg-Manago, Marianne, 1958-1961, 1979-1980, 1999, n.d.
Paris le 12 Octobre, ' 58
Dear Maxine,
I am already in Paris since 2 weeks, but I had to do many things which are waiting in the lab that I just got now to read carefully our paper -- I think more and more that the inhibition[?] of poly A polymerisation or exchange by poly U and vice versa is due to the interaction of poly A and poly U. I heard Severo discussing Poly phosphorylase at Vienna and saying that the prime effect of polynucleotides is specific. His evidence is that poly A formation is not stimulated by poly U and vice versa, but they are both stimulated by poly C and this is the only evidence for specificity. It could be better explained by the interaction of poly A with poly U -- and I don't think that he really has an evidence for specificity. It seems to me that it is really an important point to test the inhibition[?] of the enzyme by the multi stranded configuration. I wonder if you did more experiments to test this point -- your data of [ . . . ] the enzyme with the complex poly A poly U seemed to be [ . . . ] grief. Instead of having an additive effect by adding the complex to GDP you have an inhibition[?] of 30%. -- (0.11 GDP alone 0.08 GDP complex 0.004 complex)
Going back to the paper, I think it would be fine if the phosphorysis data are included.
Just some little things
p. 6 last line at a GDP/pi ratio of 0.5 and 0.01MMgcl2 I think it is 0.001 MMGCle.
p. 7 Discussion of dinucleotide[?] stimulation. Didn't we conclude that there is a stimulation when we use little enzyme and now stimulation when we use more. If not, I think we can just say that the results are inconsistent but the stimulation was never up (not go through all the results)
p. 8 may be emphatize[?] that all the 3' ended gave a stimulation as big as the 5' ended if not bigger
p. 11 It seems that there is a stimulation exchange of P32 with TRPP by poly U is it constant? Certainly the stimulation is only 15% but it might be significant.
Particularly that the exchange with TRPP seems very low and if I remember will the exchange with coli enzyme is as good with TRPP with ADP.
I am writing now the paper on phosphorolyis and I will send it to you and Leon as soon as I write it. Doty suggested to publish it on the new journal "Molecular Configuration" what do you think will it be a good journal?
How was the meeting in New York? What is new? Have you seen Severo and discussed with him?
Long asked me to write the description of polynucleotide phosphorylase and "dexynucleoside[?] trans[?] deoxyrelosyslase [?]" Has[?] with enzymbe Broch J 1952 for a Biochemist Hand book I wrote already about but I don't formed[?] anything else for the last enzyme that the two has [?] with papers. Do you know by[?] or Leon knows something more recent on this enzyme!
I am very luck[y] to have Alice del Campeleo now Alice Campbell with me this year and she already started the purification of yeast enzyme.
I don't think there was really something new in Vienna and the high polymer symposium looks pretty dull to me. The protein symposia was nice and I enjoy very much the one on virus. I don't remember if I wrote to you about Bert Grirer in Schamm's[?] laboratory gave a nice talk. He found that he can treated infective TMV RNA with nitrones[?]and[?] and desamminate[?] the bases. The RNA is still ineffective but it produces virus mutant. He can treated the TMV RNA after isolation or just treated the virus and isolate the RNA after in both case, the RNA produces mutant viruses.
I wrote a letter to our friend Jeau[?] Claude and[?] Medeline Gautier.
Catherine and Amaud[?] are fine. Amaud[?] has now an exhibition in NY. "Niveau Galeine[?]" Madison Av and 74 St -- I believe -- the exhibition will be until the 23rd of October -- if you will be in N.Y. Could you go and tell us how it was? I enjoyed to see Earl and Teny in Paris. We went shopping with Teny through all the shops in Paris.
Please give my best regards to all my friends particularly to Russ Leon and Bernie -- when is he going to N.Y.?
But regards to tour husband [ . . . ] and to you
P.S. Can Russ send to me [ . . . ] and
All the instructions for growing cells and purifying the enzyme -- By the way did you repeat the purification? The [ . . . ] send you their best regards.
Metadata Last Modified Date:
Linked Data:
RDF/XML     JSON     JSON-LD     N3/Turtle     N-Triples