Skip to main contentU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. National Library of Medicine

Profiles in Science
Pinterest badge Follow Profiles in Science on Pinterest!

The Maxine Singer Papers

Letter from Bishop William B. Friend to Maxine Singer pdf (85,815 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Letter from Bishop William B. Friend to Maxine Singer
Number of Image Pages:
2 (85,815 Bytes)
1995-06-22 (June 22, 1995)
Friend, Bishop William B.
Diocese of Shreveport
Singer, Maxine
Original Repository: Library of Congress. Maxine Singer Papers
Reproduced with permission of Bishop William B. Friend.
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH):
Advisory Committees
Religion and Science
Patents as Topic
Exhibit Category:
The Science Administrator as Advocate
Metadata Record An Introduction to Genes and Patents (May 10, 1995) pdf (517,703 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Metadata Record Letter from Jaydee Hanson and Jeremy Rifkin to Bishop William B. Friend (May 22, 1995) pdf (150,185 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Metadata Record Letter from Maxine Singer to Bishop William B. Friend (August 7, 1995) pdf (126,035 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Box Number: 46
Folder Number: 2
Unique Identifier:
Document Type:
Letters (correspondence)
Physical Condition:
Series: Subject Files, 1950-2002, n.d.
SubSeries: Boards and Committees
Folder: National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Committee on Human Values, 1977-2001, n.d.
June 22, 1995
Dear Maxine:
I hope these Summer days treat you and your husband well.
Thank you for your letter of May 24, 1995, and the inquiry about the Joint Appeal Against Human and Animal Patenting. You are always fair in your assessments, a quality that is most admirable.
The paper which I developed pretty much serves to introduce my thinking about gene patenting. While I am not interested in fostering the agenda of Jeremy Rifkin, I do wish there were more open dialogue on such an important topic.
The two issues, the patenting of human genes versus those of animal genes, needed to be separated in the Joint Appeal statement. This was the first opportunity, however, to awaken discussion among the religious leaders of the various faiths. It had some merit, therefore.
If you recall, in our assembly last October, Pope John Paul II did briefly address the topic of gene patenting after having employed the Catholic teaching on human dignity, justice and the service of science. His quote is given in my reflection.
In the longer run of time, I believe that if some of the questions are addressed as I have outlined them, Catholic teaching will endorse much of what is involved with gene patenting -- save germ-line products -- as long as the human dignity and the justice issues can be assured.
I welcome your thoughts in this matter as I very much appreciate your experience and insights.
At the present time the Bishops' Conference is handling all of the public statements. The Committee for Science and Human Values and the "powers that are" in the Conference prefer it that way. Needless to say, I have enough to do in my own backyard. I have sent my reflections to the SHV Committee, but I doubt that much will happen.
Frankly, I felt let down by the fact that decisions on how to handle this issue were made without involving or supporting that which I said when the media found no answer at NCCB.
In any case, I am interested in supporting scientists and fostering new therapies. At the same time, however, there are questions to be asked in light of the larger vision. The dialogues are needed so that we can avoid a new form of Ludditism which could become prevalent among certain religious leaders.
Again, many thanks for your interest and for all that you do in these fields.
William B. Friend
Bishop of Shreveport
Enclosures: "An Introduction to Genes and Patents"
Copy of Jeremy Rifkin's Letter of May 22, 1995
Metadata Last Modified Date:
Linked Data:
RDF/XML     JSON     JSON-LD     N3/Turtle     N-Triples