Skip to main contentU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. National Library of Medicine

Profiles in Science
Pinterest badge Follow Profiles in Science on Pinterest!

The Daniel Nathans Papers

Letter from Daniel Nathans to I. Arita pdf (66,728 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Letter from Daniel Nathans to I. Arita
Item is a photocopy.
Number of Image Pages:
1 (66,728 Bytes)
1979-02-07 (February 7, 1979)
Nathans, Daniel
Arita, I.
World Health Organization
Original Repository: Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives. Daniel Nathans Collection
Reproduced with permission of Joanne Nathans.
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH):
Variola virus
Exhibit Category:
Restriction Enzymes and the "New Genetics," 1970-1980
Unique Identifier:
Document Type:
Letters (correspondence)
Physical Condition:
February 7, 1979
Dear Dr. Arita:
I am replying to your letter of 22 January asking for my comments on retention of the variola virus and further experimentation with the virus. Your committee should know that my background is in molecular virology and that I have not worked with pox viruses. I have, however, read the documents you sent and the report in Nature on the Birmingham incident.
In my opinion, stocks of variola virus should be retained in a few, secure storage sites. I don't believe it is possible to say with assurance that smallpox will not recur, nor that a new variant, infectious for man, will not evolve with time. If such re-emergence does occur, it will be important to know how a new isolate is related to variola virus.
As for further experimentation, I believe it would be worthwhile to characterize the restriction patterns of variola virus DNA, as outlined in the material you sent, and also to prepare and store viral DNA (as well as antisera) for future detailed comparison with any new isolates that may emerge. Non-radioactive DNA is suitable for this purpose. Obviously, any experiments with the virus itself should be carried out only with strict laboratory containment, and with highly trained, vaccinated personnel. The experiments I have in mind should not take more than several months to complete, and the only hazardous part is the preparation of the virus. I don't see the need for further animal experimentation with variola virus.
As to the continuing need to maintain variola stocks, it seems to me this is best left to periodic review, perhaps at two or three year intervals.
Daniel Nathans, M.D.
Professor and Director
Department of Microbiology
Metadata Last Modified Date:
Linked Data:
RDF/XML     JSON     JSON-LD     N3/Turtle     N-Triples