Regarding the ruling on handicapped newborns which prohibits discriminatory failure to feed and care for handicapped infants
and urges the use of a Hotline telephone to Washington, D. C. , to provide information about violations, I wonder if you were
supportive of these regulations? As you well know, I am extremely supportive of life and try in every instance to make decisions
that are in the best interests of the infant. Some of these decisions, as you well know and have readily admitted, involved
deciding that all has been done for the infant that can be done, that his disease state is a terminal one, and that prolonging
his life is not in his best interest.
These regulations, however, threaten to create a "spy network" in the worst "Big Brother - 1984" sense where
people with little knowledge or understanding of the situation, can trigger a federal investigation into the actions of an
individual physician or hospital, and place the burden of proof upon the doctor and those associated with him who have made
a responsible decision in the patient's best interest.
Aside from the moral and religious questions which you have raised so meaningfully in your past activities in this area, the
concerns which you have raised regarding government interference in the lives of people, and the entry of bureaucratic decision
making foibles into personal, moral, ethical, medical decisions, has been one of the most telling arguments in favor of your
As a staunch Republican bordering philosophically on libertarianism, I cannot accept the use of the federal government in
a potentially reckless, threatening and bureaucratic fashion to accomplish what may be a most meritorious purpose from the
ethical, moral and human standpoints.
However, as your friend and strong supporter and admirer, I did not wish to embarrass you by expressing any opinions to legislators
or others in the federal bureaucracy, without letting you know my feelings and finding out your position on this matter.
I firmly believe that your leadership in the area of the ethics of right to life decisions has awakened many members of the
medical community to the problems that abortion and euthanasia regulations have created. I believe that properly presented
and advocated, a thoughtful pro-life stand wins wide support among good and thoughtful people. Regulations which allow federal
intrusion into the daily activities of the practice of medicine, will only serve to raise the hackles of those who are most
supportive of the ethical and moral issues which you favor.
I will wait to hear from you before taking any further action against these regulations, but my attitude is to oppose them
most strongly as unwarranted intrusions into the practice of medicine. If you agree with me, I would appreciate any suggestions
you may have as to what effective methods can be used to reverse these regulations. I would be happy to discuss it with you
at greater length. Please be assured that it is the method and not the intent that I oppose.