Skip to main contentU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. National Library of Medicine

Profiles in Science
Pinterest badge Follow Profiles in Science on Pinterest!

The Florence R. Sabin Papers

Letter from Florence B. Seibert to Florence R. Sabin pdf (86,389 Bytes) transcript of pdf
Letter from Florence B. Seibert to Florence R. Sabin
Seibert was a fellow member of the National Tuberculosis Association's Research Committee. Here she writes to Sabin about her plans to test further the effects of tubercle cell components on immune system response, and mentions the skepticism of Dr. Boissevain, another research committee member.
Number of Image Pages:
1 (86,389 Bytes)
1936-12-24 (December 24, 1936)
Seibert, Florence B.
Sabin, Florence R.
Original Repository: American Philosophical Society. Library. Florence R. Sabin Papers
Reproduced with permission of the American Philosophical Society.
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH):
Exhibit Category:
At the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, 1925-1938
Folder Number:
Seibert, Florence, #1
Unique Identifier:
Document Type:
Letters (correspondence)
Physical Condition:
December 24, 1936.
Dear Dr. Sabin:
First let me thank you for the beautiful Christmas Greeting card. I have saved them all for many previous years and I now have a collection of real pieces of art.
Dr. Long has turned over your letter to me. I am, therefore, undertaking an experiment which, of course, we have all had in mind for a long time -- i.e., to attempt to find some way of sensitizing uninfected animals with purified fractions or mixtures of them, to a degree approximating the sensitization occurring in a tuberculous animal. Since it was found last year that the non-antigenic PPD could be rendered antigenic by adsorption to aluminum hydroxide or charcoal, it is logical to try to increase the antigenicity of my antigenic fractions in the same way. In another series I will mix the antigenic protein with phosphatide to simulate the whole bacillus. After sensitization of the animals I will test their degree of sensitiveness with PPD and finally, if increased, I will note whether they respond with the Koch phenomenon to an injection of live bacilli.
We have repeatedly stressed this discrepancy between the degree of sensitization evident in infected animals and those uninfected but sensitized with protein fractions. You recall that Dr. Boissevain insisted this was the one thing he had against my work.
When he visited our laboratory the day after the meeting at your laboratory he repeated this statement. A lively discussion followed in which I had an excellent opportunity to stress serious weaknesses in conclusions he has drawn from his own work and also to emphasize my great admiration for the work you and Dr. Anderson are doing and its undoubted value for further work in tuberculosis. He finally said if all I said was true he would have to take back what he said about Dr. Anderson, but he wasn't sure yet. So I believe with time he will understand it sufficiently to see its value.
With the very best wishes for continued success in the New Year,
Sincerely yours,
Florence B. Seibert
Metadata Last Modified Date:
Linked Data:
RDF/XML     JSON     JSON-LD     N3/Turtle     N-Triples