A propos your piece in TIBS 11/78: let me take the occasion to take issue with your attribution to Griffith that "the
pabulum was the carbohydrate antigen itself."
I have joined the issue before: but I think you will find Griffith's own language compelling. Of course, we now have to
retranslate protein structure: but what is most clear is that Griffith did not identify this with the carbohydrate.
If you agree, could I move you to volunteer a footnote of correction -- better than my seeming to make an unwarranted fuss.